'Lord of The Rings/Kite Runner Compare and Contrast Essay Essay\r'

'What objects do you associate pureness with? Marriage, virginity, a childhood toy? When we designate of office we gestate of struggle; we think of negativity. When the phrase ‘ maternal forge’ comes to mind, we go to our gets tucking us into bed and watching the bet on with our spawnsâ€at least that is what us lucky hotshots think of. Not every unmatchable is lucky enough to hold in that honor stored forever, violent free lives, and a render and pay back by our side.\r\nThe Kite counterbalance and shaper of the wing have many similarities, particularly when comparing themes such as passing play of innocence, office staff and dominance, and paternal works and the ship canal in which they are depicted by dint of symbolization and ridicule. From the beginning of The Kite contrabandist Hoseinni showed innocence by dint of amir’s passion and impulse for increases, provided non any kite; ameer longed for the triumphant kite in the ann ual kite loyal tournament. Kites were constantly present during emir’s childhood. They were his honesty and his purity; the goodnessness and purity of Afghanistan at that time.\r\n ameer’s innocence was stolen by him when he was twelve-years-old by the neighborhood bully, Assef. Amir longed for the winning kite, exactly at the expense of his friend, Hassan: â€Å"But in that location were ii things amid the drivel that I couldn’t cease looking at: One was the blue kite resting against the wall,” (75). Amir witnessed the despoil of Hassan, and after he as wellk his trophy kite abode and hung it up on the wall it mocked him, reminding him of his cowardice, and the purity and the innocence that were taken from him. When Amir re wrestleed to Kabul as an with child(p) there were no kites.\r\nAfghanistan had been phlebotomise over by the Taliban and everything had been destroyed, just deal the innocence that was taken by Amir and the goodness and th at was stolen from him. In The Kite Runner, Amir precious the winning kite. After witnessing the rape of Hassanâ€witnessing his dear(p) friend sacrifice himself for the first place kite and seeing Kabul in ruin with the kites bypast and the tournaments ended, he craves the innocence and goodness of his past. In master of the Flies, Golding designd symbols very similarly to Hoseinni’s use of the kite as a symbol of innocence.\r\n quite of an object or toy, Golding used Simon to show purity. Simon, the placidity and kind hearted boy, was murdered savagely by his peers. Simon had been the good and the innocent on the island; unlike the other boys he knew that the evil was inside of the others, though he himself had been too good for the evil. Simon was taken apart from the boys provided not by outsiders, like the Taliban; the boys themselves took Simon away, unlike The Kite Runner where Assef and the Taliban took the innocence away from Amir. â€Å"There were no forg es, and no movements notwithstanding the tearing of teeth and claws” (153).\r\nThe boys turned into savages and took Simon away from themselves. Unlike The Kite Runner, Simon and innocence were not wanted and were easily thrget away. As goodness was creation murdered, the boys turned into monsters. Not once did they think of what was world depleted. Another theme shared by the two novels is the idea of power and dominance. In The Kite Runner, Hoseinni showed this through the bully Assef, who later became a Taliban official. Not except did Hoseinni use Assef and the Taliban as symbols of power, alone he enforced them through raillery.\r\nOne example of dramatic irony in The Kite Runner took place when Baba was verbaliseing to Amir as a child. Baba utter to him, â€Å"’ perfection help us all if Afghanistan ever falls into their hands! ’” (17). Baba was referring to the Taliban and how he hoped they would never come into power, though consequently, the Taliban later dominate Afghanistan. Baba pleads to God for help if the Taliban firing off over, he pleads to a God that he doesn’t necessarily believe in, and ironically, the Taliban justify all of their actions with the word of God. Likewise, Golding used Jack and his hunters to illustrate power and dominance in Lord of the Flies.\r\nIn order to call forth their dominance Jack and his hunters murdered the pig in an ostentatious manner thinking that organism shabby and strong will pick out respect. Not hardly did Jack allege his power through spectacular hunting acts, but he also impose power with his violent mannerisms towards Ralph, Piggy, and the others. Jack is not the tho power cypher in this study. In turn, the British official that appeared to rescue the boys has a stature of power along with the British army. Golding expressed his love of irony with the British soldier on the island as well.\r\nThe boys had been creating their own war on the island, and they were, in a way, mimicking the war that had been happening on a world-wide scale. Golding did not stop here, as the British soldier then spy the boys savagery, he reprimanded them for not being more(prenominal) befitting and British. â€Å"’I should have thought that a crew of British boysâ€you’re all British, aren’t you? â€would have been able to put up a improve show than thatâ€â€˜â€ (202). How ironic, that despite the soldier’s talk of being proper and â€Å"English,” he too was being a savage. He too, was in the middle of a war.\r\nNot only do The Kite Runner and Lord of the Flies share themes of innocence and power, but they both partake in the lack of imperious parental model. In The Kite Runner, Amir envied the father-son kin that Hassan and his believed-to-be-father, Ali, shared. Like his stolen innocence, Amir yearned for his father’s approval, for these were the things he could not have. â€Å"Heâ⠂¬â„¢d close the entrée, buy the farm me to wonder why it was always grown-ups’ time with him” (5). Here, Hoseinni intelligibly illustrates that as growing up, and even as an adult, Amir never received the love and the affection that he so craved from his father.\r\nAt every turn he would find a closed door; Baba would see Amir as a calamity. The one person who gave Amir positive parental mildew was his father’s friend and business partner, Rahim Kahn. Amir did not take this influence to heart; his longing for approval from Baba and a mother he did not have created a hole that Rahim Kahn could not fill. With a deceased mother and apathetic father, Amir had a deep hunger for a father bode to such a degree that the lack of a parental influence caused self destruction and amiable instability. In contrast to The Kite Runner, the boys in Lord of the Flies did not care for paternal influences as Amir did.\r\nIn fact, they rejoiced because there were no a dults on the island to keep them in check; â€Å"’Aren’t there any grownups at all? ’ ‘I tire’t think so. ’ The fair boy said this solemnly; but then delight of a realized ambition overcame him’” (8). From the start, Amir wanted the parental influences that he grew up without; the boys on the island were more than contented to be rid of them. The consequences of the lack of parental influence did not make an appearance right away, but contrary to what the boys believed, not having a parental figure did have its repercussions.\r\nOne can take Roger, in consideration. At first he could not bring himself to throw stones at the smaller, younger boys. The memories of civilization and punishments even had their hold on him, but as the story progresses, Roger finds himself becoming less and less humane; much(prenominal) like Assef, in The Kite Runner, who as a child, subconsciously knew he could be punished for his bullying, but as he grew older and as the influence of his parents lessened, he was able to use his wrath all the same he pleased.\r\nThe lack of parental influence in Lord of the Flies through the immature, adolescent way of the boys and lack of adults residing on the island leads to destruction and chaos, similar in ways to that of Amir’s, but far more externally dramatic. Indeed, Golding and Hoseinni share many tastes when it comes to writing, and that becomes quite apparent(a) when one looks at the themes of the two novels. Through the loss of innocence, power and dominance, and the lack of those positive parental influences Golding and Hoseinni give care to paint the picture of a life unalike than the life of the average American youth.\r\nAmir unbroken his innocence in a kite. In his homeland. The boys on the island never knew that their innocence lay within one small boy. They didn’t have a father to look up to, a mother to run to, and neither did Amir. Now, innocence is mocked. Parental figures are pushed away, but most don’t know what it is like to lose that innocence. To not have a mother or father there in time of need. Where is your innocence stored? Where do you find the comfort and resistance that are craved through a mother’s love and a father’s adoring pride?\r\n'